A Bill to Protect Military Recruiters

I am completing Defending College Heights, afirst-time offenders and a term of three years or
novel about an Irish Catholic family and a collegeless for subsequent offense. There are state and
administration in the aftermath of the murder oflocal laws to protect persons and private property
a U.S. Army recruiter. I started work onand the military abides by those laws just as
Defending because I had connections in the highercivilians do. In effect, this bill makes certain forms
education community who were quiteof civilian protest, especially the more violent acts,
knowledgeable on the issues, or had workeda federal crime.
closely with military recruiters on campus.Akin has 26 co-sponsors, all Republicans, most
In my research, I went back to pro-military asfrom states that attract large numbers of young
well as anti-war protests against the Vietnammen and women to the military: Florida, Georgia,
War. Then, and now, there were confrontationsSouth Carolina, Texas and Virginia. However, while
between military personnel and civilians. Most ofthe bill lists several examples of acts against
these protests were non-violent, but others werepersons and property, none of these happened in
not. Kent State, where four students were killeda sponsor's home state. This, and the gray areas,
and nine wounded, was perhaps the tipping pointinterference and intimidation, do not bode well for
of the protest movement.the bill.
Whatever we think of the war in Afghanistan orI understand the most obvious intentions of H.R.
the war in Iraq, we owe our citizens who choose6023, to protect the rights and property of
to serve our respect; they made their choice andrecruiters and recruits. This bill would be a great
they are making the ultimate sacrifice. Unlawfulaccomplishment for a conservative Congressman
attacks on military recruiters or their place ofto bring home to his or her district. But I am
work are a crime, and will not force them touncomfortable with those same representatives
change their message. If anything, they will catchmistaking peaceful protest as interference or
their opponent's attention.intimidation. A bill such as H.R. 6023 would open
One Republican congressman, Todd Akin ofthe door for the federal courts to make those
Missouri, has introduced a bill, posted as H.R. 6023,judgments.
also called the Freedom to Serve Act of 2008.Whatever your political stripes, you have to agree
Introduced in the House Judiciary Committee onthat those who cause injury or damage property
May 12, the act prohibits certain forms ofshould be punished. But there is a reason why
interference against military recruiting. Most arethese powers, with respect to private property
obvious crimes: destruction of property andand personal injury, are vested with the states.
infliction of injury being prime examples, butThe states want to set the punishment that fits
others are gray areas; even peaceful protest inthe crime. They don't want the federal
front of a recruiting office could be consideredgovernment to intimidate or interfere.
interference and intimidation (those exact words(Originally published at Educated Quest blog and
are used in the bill).reprinted with permission of the author, Stuart
The act proposes a 1 year prison term forNachbar).