How to join the police academy


njrcpi.org keyword stats



Most current MSN search phrases:

about protection
police police_academy.md
daniel janet
background crime
number training
richard physical training for a georgia police
arkansas law enforcement training philbin
teacher police new orleans academy
victim working
essays why i want to become a police become a juvenile delinquency officer
culinary juvenile corrections officers california
how to be a police officer in florida background checks for law enforcement
computer handcuffs
what kind of background is needed to what you need to become a police officer
police disqualifications "Private Investigator Badges"
rottweiler medical disqualification for jobs
private LAPD Training Academy
qualifications arkansas police Qualification to be a doctor
how to become a florida police officer psychic
police fysical training New Jersey Police Jobs
lapd police academy archives degree

Exclusive Remedy Provisions - Why You Cannot Sue Your Own Employer When Injured

Many clients, sometimes after years ofpunitive  damages.
litigating a workers' compensation claim, get
to the frustration point where they decide:Also, as an incentive to industry, workers'
"I guess I'm going to have to sue mybenefits under the act would be limited.
employer." It is at this point that theGenerally, an injured worker is entitled to
harsh reality must be revealed (ortwo-thirds of his or her "average weekly
reiterated). In most cases, if you have awage" with a cap in place in many
workers' compensation claim, you cannot suejurisdictions. In Georgia, for example, as
your employer, even if it was negligent, forof June 30, 1990, the maximum benefit an
the same injury. This article will try toinjured worker was entitled to was $175.00
explain the logic behind the exclusionper week, regardless of his or her injury or
commonly known as "the exclusive remedypre-injury wages. Even in 2006, after
provision".significant increases in the last fifteen
years, the maximum rate in Georgia is less
Before workers compensation statutes camethan $24,000 per year. (O.C.G.A 34-9-261)
into existence, the same rules applied toThe median household income during the same
work related accidents as any other civilperiod  of  time  was  $48,388.
claim. If one was injured at work and the
employer was negligent, a civil suit could be(
brought against the employer for damages.
However, in many cases, the injured workerIn some jurisdictions, there are exceptions
would be out of work and unable to feed histo the exclusive remedy provision. If the
family or obtain medical treatment. If theemployer is guilty of gross negligence or
case was complicated, attorney fees, courtwillful misconduct, an injured worker may be
costs and expert witness fees could not beable to obtain benefits over and above those
paid. The employer had a distinct advantage.provided by workers' compensation. For
Even if a favorable verdict was obtained, itexample, in Massachusetts, an employee's
took months and the losing side was entitledcompensation is doubled in these types of
to  appeal.cases with the employer paying the additional
benefits. At lease one jurisdiction allows a
To even the playing field, beginning in thechoice of remedies where the employer is
1910s, lawmakers began creating theguilty  of  gross  or  willful  negligence.
"workmen's compensation" laws on which the
current law are based. The concept wasThere are other exceptions but they are rare.
fairly simple: create a system where anIn certain contract cases, an employer may
injured employee received compensation andbe brought in as a result of an
medical treatment where he or she was injuredindemnification agreement with a third party.
in an incident which arose out of and in theAlso, if the employer is acting in a
course of employment. Benefits were paiddifferent capacity than employer, the
quickly and regardless of fault. If the caseexclusive remedy bar may not apply. Another
was disputed, it was handledexample is in a loaned servant situation such
administratively, generally without suitas an employee working for a temp service.
being  filed  and  without  a  jury  trial.However, most states treat the both the
direct employer and the company that pays
On the surface, these laws seem to favorthe leasing company as "employer" for
employees. However, as time would tell, theworkers'  compensation  purposes.
benefit to employers was significant.
Contingency fees and non-economic damages,The level of frustration is tremendous for
such as pain and suffering, were in theirboth employees and attorneys in the area of
infancy in the 1920s. In the heyday of theexclusive remedy. It does not seem right
pre tort reform era, a person could recoverthat an employer can be negligent and be
much more in a personal injury case than theyimmune from suit. It is more unfair that an
could in a workers' compensation claim,employer can cause injury due to gross or
sometimes ten times as much or more.willful misconduct with no consequences in
Therefore, in a case where an individual wasmost jurisdictions. The frustration
killed on the job as a result of hisintensifies when you learn you cannot sue a
employer's negligence, benefits to hiscompany who is not your employer - the
dependents under workers compensation are"statutory employer" concept but that
generally limited. If he or she had nodiscussion  is  for  another  article.
dependents, in many states the employer would
only have to pay for medical treatment beforeWhen your lawyer, family or a friend tells
death. The same circumstances in a lawsuityou "You cannot sue your employer", it may
would likely result in a six or seven figurenot seem just or fair. Sadly, however, it is
settlement or verdict with the potential forprobably correct.



1 A B C 43 44 45 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87