The Road to Job Creation Begins With Government Procurement Practices

President Obama has spoken eloquently and oftenthis contract would have created 250 new,
about his determination to create jobs in America,high-paying jobs in our plant, and an estimated
and to curtail the practice of sole-sourceone thousand additional jobs in our supply chain,
procurement at the Pentagon. But it would appearsince 100% of our product content is American
that the Department of Defense hasn't beenmade.
listening.So, in the midst of war and economic recession,
Our company, Infrastructure Defensethe DLA has chosen to stick it to our soldiers,
Technologies, LLC ("IDT"), is a manufacturer oftaxpayers, workers and industrial base in one fell
protective barriers for the U.S. Military. We haveswoop. They have also disregarded two of
seen firsthand the manner in which the DefensePresident Obama's key initiatives: The creation of
establishment is destroying the National Defensejobs, and the end of sole-source monopolies on
Industrial Base by doling out sole-source contractsdefense expenditures.
to foreign companies amid the trials of war andNicely done, DLA.
economic depression.  Following is the story ofThere is no shortage of stories about contracting
our company, and a recommendation to theproblems at the Department of Defense, where
White House on how to fix the continued practicemany of their largest suppliers are foreign entities.
of outsourcing the Pentagon at the cost of The recent KC-X tanker battle between
American jobs and manufacturing on the homeAmerican based Boeing and European Aeronautic
front.Defense and Space represents a case-in-point. 
Protective barriers are a mainstay of the militaryBut how do we solve this issue of the Defense
supply chain, and are deployed at every AmericanDepartment's coddling of foreign companies at the
base throughout Iraq and Afghanistan. For the lastexpense of American jobs and industrial security?
seven years, the Defense Logistics AgencyThe answer is surprisingly simple, and it's called
("DLA" - the support agency of the Departmentthe Buy American Act.
of Defense charged with supplying protectiveThe Buy American Act sounds like a great
barrier equipment) has purchased over $1 billionprovision, but like most things political, its meaning
worth of these products from a foreignhas been diluted over time.  The Act was signed
company, on a sole-source contract. What'sinto law by President Franklin D. Roosevelt in 1933,
worse, our government has paid for theseand required the United States Government to
purchases in foreign currency, at an unfavorableprefer U.S .made products in its purchases. Fast
exchange rate to U.S. Taxpayers.forward to 2010, where countries allied with the
In 2008, the DLA was ordered by Pentagon brassUnited States by treaty or trade agreement are
to find alternatives to the foreign barrier productspermitted to compete for U.S. Government
for the purposes of breaking the sole-sourceprocurements on an equal footing with American
monopoly, finding better protection for ourbusinesses.
deployed troops and increasing the longevity ofThe practice of allowing foreign entities to bid for
service in the field (the foreign product wasAmerican contracts as equals with American
reported in a U.S. Air Force Memorandum ascompanies cannot be justified in the face of
"failing in as little as six months to one year").empirical evidence which illustrates its absurdity.
The DLA responded to the Pentagon order byWhile supporters of unrestricted free trade are
conducting a competitive solicitation for barriers,quick to point out that international agreements
which required that protective characteristics andare reciprocal, two examples nullify their
technical capabilities would be the most importantargument. First, the U.S. Government purchases
criteria of evaluation. The winner of thefar more than any other nation on Earth, which
competitive process would be awarded a fourmakes justification of reciprocity on equal terms
year contract worth $400 million.impossible on the grounds of parity. Second is
IDT's barrier product was judged by the DefenseAmerica's trade deficit, which is killing our
Logistics Agency to offer the best protectivecompetitiveness, harming our currency and
benefits to the U.S. Military. Our Technical Proposalweakening the overall economy.
was rated best among all offerors, and our priceConsider for a moment the benefits of true
was determined to be "fair and reasonable". Yet,preference for American-made goods in the
despite these facts, the DLA rewarded the samegovernment procurement system. Contracts to
foreign company it had been sole-sourcing for theU.S. businesses will create jobs, which will in turn
previous seven years, thus continuing theircreate new taxpayers and reduce unemployment
monopoly status in the military supply chain.rolls. Domestic procurement will stimulate capital
IDT promptly filed a formal bid protest with theexpenditures on durable goods such as machinery
Government Accountability Office ("GAO"), andand equipment, thus stimulating downstream
asserted that the foreign company was ineligibleproductivity. U.S. businesses pay income taxes on
for award because they failed to meet thetheir profits, whereas foreign entities use our
requirements of the DLA's solicitation. The DLAmoney to pay taxes in their own countries. 
responded to our protest by petitioning the GAOFinally, present-day prosperity breeds future
to dismiss our protest in order that they mayingenuity through research, development and
take "Corrective Action"….presumably to correctexpertise (formerly referred to as American
the mistakes they made in awarding an ineligibleknow-how).
foreign vendor with $400 million in U.S. TaxpayerBased upon the foregoing, a 25% price
treasure.consideration should be given to any American
Well, the DLA took corrective action alright. Theycompany which offers a product or service to
allowed the foreign company to fix their ineligiblethe U.S. Government in the presence of foreign
offer, then rewarded them yet again.competition.  And unlike most measures in
IDT is based in the President's home State ofWashington, this highly effective strategy could be
Illinois. Our town of Belvidere (and the greaterimplemented in short order due to its simplicity
Rockford area), has an unenviable unemploymentand popularity with the American People.
rate of 22% (and rising). A successful award of