Enforcement of patents

>bases are a subset of the requirements for
How to enforce patents through civil lawsuitspatentability in the relevant country. Whilst an
Normal 0 false false falseinfringer is generally free to rely on any available
MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 /* Style Definitions */ground of invalidity (such as a prior publication, for
table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Tableexample), some countries have permissions to
Normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;prevent the same validity questions being
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes;relitigated. An example is the UK Certificate of
mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0incontested validity.
5.4pt; mso-para-margin:0in;Rationale
mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;There are four main acts alive in the patent
mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:10.0pt;system: to invent in the first place; to unveil the
font-family:"Times New Roman";invention once made; to invest the sums required
mso-ansi-language:#0400;to experiment, produce and promote the
mso-fareast-language:#0400;invention; and to design around and improve upon
mso-bidi-language:#0400;}earlier patents.
Generally speaking, Patents can only be enforced1.         Patents provide motivation for
through civil lawsuits (for example, for a U.S.economically efficient research and development
patent, by an action for patent breach in a United(R&D). Many large modern corporations have
States federal court), although some countriesannual R&D budgets of hundreds of millions or
(such as France and Austria) have criminaleven billions of dollars. Without patents, R&D
punishments for willful infringement. Typically, thespending would be much less or eliminated
patent owner will seek monetary compensationaltogether, limiting the possibility of technological
for past breach, and will seek a restrictionadvances or breakthroughs.
stopping the defendant from engaging in future2.         In accordance with the original
acts of breach. In order to prove breach, themeaning of the term "patent," patents facilitate
patent owner must set up that the accusedand encourage disclosure of creations into the
infringer practices all of the requirements of atpublic domain for the common good. If inventors
least one of the claims of the patent (noting thatdid not have the legal protection of patents, in
in many authorities the scope of the patent maymany cases, they would prefer or tend to keep
not be restricted to what is literally stated in thetheir inventions secret.
claims, for example due to the "doctrine of3.         In many industries (especially
equivalents").those with high fixed costs and either low
An important restriction on the ability of a patentinsignificant costs or low reverse engineering costs
owner to successfully assert the patent in civil— computer processors, software, and
litigation is the accused infringer's right to challengepharmaceuticals for example), once an invention
the legacy of that patent. Civil courts hearingexists, the cost of marketing (testing, tooling up a
patent cases can and often do declare patentsfactory, developing a market, etc.) is far more
not valid. The grounds on which a patent can bethan the initial conception cost. (I.e. the internal
found not valid are set out in the relevant patent"rule of thumb" at several computer companies in
legislation and vary between countries. Often, thethe 1980s was that post-R&D costs were 7-to-1).